The people in the whole world are good. There is some good in each and every one of us and every action of humans have another side of the story. It is the limits decided by us which tells us to classify the actions as good or bad. Based on this assumptions and standards that we decide upon and set, we are empowered to classify and judge the actions of others. But we may, every now and then question the initial definitions of Good and Bad. Basing the system of Law and order on such assumptions is not only dangerous but also advocates people to contest or defend the actions of others and makes people commit actions that can be justified in their own ways. This most definitely necessitates a need for an absolute system which is free of any assumptions and relies on definitions accepted by all. The best thing to relate to this is the definition of a meter of length. There have been many attempts to define the metric length but finally it was all relative. It is relative to a piece of metal kept in one corner of the world and everyone else is educated about it. But why arent laws also standardized and similar in nature. Why is there a big religional influence on political and judicial systems all over the world? There are many other questions not just pertaining to judicial systems which relies on assumptions and relativity which could be a major thing to think about.
 |
| Tea and snacks. A very good time to think |
No comments:
Post a Comment